Top arrow pointing up

Application Process

Getting Started

LaserNetUS invites scientists and engineers from all scientific and technical disciplines to propose experiments that leverage the extensive laser and diagnostic capabilities of LaserNetUS. International Principal Investigators (PIs) and teams are also encouraged to apply. Our user base includes individuals from universities, national laboratories, and private companies.

To apply, you must write a proposal using the official LaserNetUS templates and provide additional details on funding, safety, and export control. Prior to awards, proposals undergo rigorous peer and technical feasibility reviews.

LaserNetUS currently offers two types of proposals. Please select from Regular User Proposals and Joint Research Initiatives in the sidebar for specific guidelines and to download the most up-to-date template. If you have questions about proposal submissions, please refer to our Quick Reference Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, or contact our coordinator at ccurry@slac.stanford.edu

Regular User Proposals

Participating Facilities



Colorado State University - Advanced Beam Laboratory


Colorado State University

Advanced Beam Laboratory

Point of contact: Jorge Rocca, jorge.rocca@colostate.edu

Discover More >


 
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique - Advanced Laser Light Source


Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS)

Advanced Laser Light Source (ALLS)

Point of contact: François Légaré, francois.legare@inrs.ca

Discover More >


 
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA) Center


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator (BELLA) Center

Point of contact: Cameron Geddes, cgrgeddes@lbl.gov

Discover More >



Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Jupiter Laser Facility


Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Jupiter Laser Facility

Point of contact: Félicie Albert, albert6@llnl.gov

Discover More >



University of Rochester - Laboratory for Laser Energetics: OMEGA EP


University of Rochester

Laboratory for Laser Energetics: OMEGA EP

Point of contact: Mingsheng Wei, mingsheng@lle.rochester.edu

Discover More >



University of Michigan - Michigan Target Research and Fabrication (MiTRF)


University of Michigan

Michigan Target Research and Fabrication (MiTRF)

Point of contact: Sallee R. Klein, salleer@umich.edu

Discover More >



Eligibility

Regular User Proposals are designed for user-led experiments requiring minimal facility support. Users should assemble a multidisciplinary team with the necessary expertise to design and execute the experiment and train and supervise students at all times. Successful applicants will undergo a facility-specific readiness review to ensure preparedness.

If you are new to LaserNetUS or high-power laser experiments, we recommend applying for a Joint Research Initiative for your first experiment. Starting from Cycle 7, we have updated our terminology: roles on an experiment are now defined as Principal Investigator (PI), Co-Principal Investigators (Co-PIs), and Collaborators. Students can serve as PIs but must have an experienced Co-PI and include a detailed training and supervision plan in their proposal.

 

Proposal Template

All LaserNetUS proposals must be prepared using the proposal-type-specific template. The format and detailed guidelines are intended to help new applicants prepare competitive proposals and standardize the proposal review process.

Steps to Prepare Your Proposal

  • Use the proposal-type-specific template to prepare your proposal. The main proposal, excluding references and appendices, must be 6 pages. Additionally, you are strongly encouraged to complete the appendices for the tentative research team, technical parameter table, and target support request.

  • To learn more about the available facilities and diagnostics, please visit our Facilities page. This page offers detailed information about each facility, including its capabilities, available diagnostics, and facility representatives’ contact information. Additionally, attending the Town Hall hosted by the Facility Points of Contact (POCs) each cycle is the best way to get this information quickly. Below, you will find specific changes from the previous cycle.

  • If your proposal is similar to a previous one (whether declined or awarded), you will be asked for a brief summary of changes or progress update in the LaserNetUS Proposal Details survey.

  • Each proposal is for one specific experiment, with the option to designate a first and second choice for a facility. The Proposal Review Panel (PRP) will rank the proposal for the primary facility and consider it for the secondary facility if it was not competitive for the primary facility. If not competitive at either, an alternative facility may be recommended.

  • Specify safety-related details in the LaserNetUS Initial Safety Screening survey during the proposal submission process. List and describe any safety concerns related to samples, equipment, or techniques and how these issues will be addressed.

  • There is no cost to submit proposals or conduct experiments at participating institutions. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (DOE-FES) provides experiment time at LaserNetUS facilities free of charge, but users are generally responsible for their own travel, target expenses, and hardware required by the experiment. While most of our users fund their experiments through larger research grants, limited funds are available to Principal Investigators (PIs). The LaserNetUS Users Office will contact PIs of shortlisted experiments to apply for travel and Materials and Supplies (M&S) mini-grants.

  • Proposals may address broader problems than a single experiment can cover. All proposals must be resubmitted for peer review each cycle. Without sufficient progress information (e.g., data dissemination, publications), the PRP may postpone consideration until a future cycle.

  • The PRP will consider the applicant’s publication record from prior LaserNetUS facility times. Failure to publish on time could impact the chances of a successful application in a similar area.

  • Proposals can be resubmitted at each call, but this will not happen automatically, and resubmissions will not receive preference during the review process.

  • Multiple submissions from the same team for similar experiments at different LaserNetUS facilities will not be considered. While there is no limit to the number of distinct proposals a team can submit, the PRP may favor the first-best proposal from each team.

  • Proposal teams must acknowledge the host institution and DOE Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences in presentations and publications using the following boilerplate language: “This work was supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences under Contract No. [LaserNetUS contract number from facility]: the LaserNetUS initiative at [Facility],” and any other acknowledgments required by the host institution.

  • The Advanced Beam Laboratory is participating in both the Regular User Proposals and Joint Research Initiatives. Applicants must discuss their needs with the facility point of contact, Jorge Rocca (jorge.rocca@colostate.edu), well in advance of the deadline to confirm the appropriate proposal type.
  • The Jupiter Laser Facility will commission STILETTO in January 2025. Prospective users interested in including STILETTO in their proposals should contact Félicie Albert (albert6@llnl.gov) prior to submission to discuss their specific parameter requirements.
  • Expanded offerings by Michigan Target Research and Fabrication (MiTRF): Consultation, Component Procurement, Fabrication and/or Assembly, and Characterization. All LaserNetUS laser facility proposals can also request target support from MiTRF by adding a target support request to their Experimental Time Request. Applicants must discuss their target needs with Sallee Klein (salleer@umich.edu) and her team in advance of submission.
  • We continue to only accept Laboratory for Laser Energetics: OMEGA EP proposals for experiments related to inertial fusion energy (IFE) during Cycle 7.

Important Dates

Key Events and Deadlines

LaserNetUS has adopted a consistent annual call for proposals to streamline the application process and provide clarity for applicants. Please refer to the following dates below for key events and deadlines. More details can be accessed by clicking the links to the event pages.

 

Announcement Cycle 7 Call for Proposals October 4, 2024
LaserNetUS Open Office Hours,
Virtual (Zoom), RSVP Required
Wednesdays, Starting
October 16, 2024, to
November 27, 2024,
from 10-11 AM PT
Proposal Writing Workshop Wednesday, October 23,
2024, from 10-11 AM PT
Town Hall for Cycle 7,
Virtual (Zoom), Join Now
Thursday, November 14,
2024, from 10-11:30 AM PT
Deadline for Proposal Submission December 16, 2024,
by 4 PM PT
Proposal Review January 16, 2025, to
February 17, 2025
Technical Feasibility Review February 24, 2025, to
March 11, 2025
Award Letters Sent Late March
Experiment Dates September 2025* to
August 2026


*The earliest start date will depend on facility readiness and proposal feasibility.

Please note: The dates provided are approximate and subject to change at any time. Applicants are encouraged to regularly check for updates to ensure they have the most current information.

 

Ready to Submit a Proposal?

LaserNetUS has transitioned to the Universal Proposal System (UPS), a common platform for managing user scientific proposals across multiple facilities, developed collaboratively by SLAC, Argonne, and Brookhaven National Laboratories. Learn more.

LaserNetUS proposals must be submitted through UPS. To ensure your proposal is complete, all collaborators must have an active UPS account and be listed on the proposal.

Important Note: All members of the research team listed on a proposal must have a UPS account linked to the proposal before submission. Otherwise, the proposal will not be considered.

Proposal Review Process

  1. Proposal Screening and Assignments
    Submitted proposals are first screened for completeness and quality. The Proposal Administrator and the Chair of the Proposal Review Panel (PRP) are responsible for this initial screening. The Chair then assigns three reviewers to each proposal based on subject matter expertise and avoiding known conflicts of interest (COI) from the panel. One of the three reviewers is designated as the primary reviewer.

  2. Initial Review Stage
    All PRP members are required to read at minimum the abstract of all other proposals to gain a broad understanding of the submissions. During this stage, PRP members review the basic information of each proposal to identify any additional COI. Each proposal is then scored using a rubric that evaluates Intellectual Merit (75%) and Broader Impact (25%). This rubric was developed based on the proposal-type-specific template to ensure consistency and fairness in the evaluation process.

  3. Proposal Review Panel Meeting
    Initial rankings are determined based on the quantitative scores from the reviews. The PRP meets in person, and the primary reviewers lead a detailed discussion of each proposal. During this discussion, the panel considers the scores and engages in a thorough conversation. The panel then sorts the proposals by facility and ranks them, taking into account topical balance and a risk/reward assessment to ensure a well-rounded selection. The lead reviewer is responsible for compiling the comments and feedback from the three reviewers and the panel discussion, which is then provided to the applicant.

  4. Facility Feasibility Review
    The short-listed proposals (available slots plus 1-2 alternates) for each facility are forwarded to the Facility POC to evaluate technical feasibility. This review ensures that the proposed experiments can be practically and safely conducted with the available resources and infrastructure.

  5. Final Decisions
    The PRP Chair integrates the results of the review and the feasibility assessments to create a final list of recommendations. This list is reviewed by the LaserNetUS Coordinator and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES), who has final approval of awards. Decision letters are emailed to each Principal Investigator (PI), Facility POC, and the LaserNetUS User Office informing them of the outcome.

Getting Started

LaserNetUS invites scientists and engineers from all scientific and technical disciplines to propose experiments that leverage the extensive laser and diagnostic capabilities of LaserNetUS. International Principal Investigators (PIs) and teams are also encouraged to apply. Our user base includes individuals from universities, national laboratories, and private companies.

To apply, you must write a proposal using the official LaserNetUS templates and provide additional details on funding, safety, and export control. Prior to awards, proposals undergo rigorous peer and technical feasibility reviews.

LaserNetUS currently offers two types of proposals. Please select from Regular User Proposals and Joint Research Initiatives in the sidebar for specific guidelines and to download the most up-to-date template. If you have questions about proposal submissions, please refer to our Quick Reference Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, or contact our coordinator at ccurry@slac.stanford.edu.

Joint Research Initiative Proposals

Participating Facilities



Colorado State University - Advanced Beam Laboratory


Colorado State University

Advanced Beam Laboratory

Point of contact: Jorge Rocca, jorge.rocca@colostate.edu

Discover More >



University of Central Florida - Institute for the Frontier of Attosecond Science and Technology (iFAST)


University of Central Florida

Institute for the Frontier of Attosecond Science and Technology (iFAST)

Point of contact: Li Fang, li.fang@ucf.edu

Discover More >



University of Maryland - Laboratory for Intense Laser-Matter Interaction Physics


University of Maryland

Laboratory for Intense Laser-Matter Interaction Physics

Point of contact: Howard Milchberg, milch@umd.edu

Discover More >



University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) - Phoenix Laser Laboratory


University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)

Phoenix Laser Laboratory

Point of contact: Christoph Niemann, cniemann@ucla.edu

Discover More >



The Ohio State University - Scarlet Laser Facility


The Ohio State University

Scarlet Laser Facility

Point of contact: Douglass Schumacher, schumacher.60@osu.edu

Discover More >



University of Michigan - Michigan Target Research and Fabrication (MiTRF)


University of Michigan

Michigan Target Research and Fabrication (MiTRF)

Point of contact: Sallee R. Klein, salleer@umich.edu

Discover More >



Eligibility

Regular User Proposals are designed for user-led experiments requiring minimal facility support. Users should assemble a multidisciplinary team with the necessary expertise to design and execute the experiment and train and supervise students at all times. Successful applicants will undergo a facility-specific readiness review to ensure preparedness.

If you are new to LaserNetUS or high-power laser experiments, we recommend applying for a Joint Research Initiative for your first experiment. Starting from Cycle 7, we have updated our terminology: roles on an experiment are now defined as Principal Investigator (PI), Co-Principal Investigators (Co-PIs), and Collaborators. Students can serve as PIs but must have an experienced Co-PI and include a detailed training and supervision plan in their proposal.

 

Proposal Template

All LaserNetUS proposals must be prepared using the proposal-type-specific template. The format and detailed guidelines are intended to help new applicants prepare competitive proposals and standardize the proposal review process.

Steps to Prepare Your Proposal

  • Use the proposal-type-specific template to prepare your proposal. The main proposal, excluding references and appendices, must be 6 pages. Additionally, you are strongly encouraged to complete the appendices for the tentative research team, technical parameter table, and target support request.

  • To learn more about the available facilities and diagnostics, please visit our Facilities page. This page offers detailed information about each facility, including its capabilities, available diagnostics, and facility representatives’ contact information. Additionally, attending the Town Hall hosted by the Facility Points of Contact (POCs) each cycle is the best way to get this information quickly. Below, you will find specific changes from the previous cycle.

  • If your proposal is similar to a previous one (whether declined or awarded), you will be asked for a brief summary of changes or progress update in the LaserNetUS Proposal Details survey.

  • Each proposal is for one specific experiment, with the option to designate a first and second choice for a facility. The Proposal Review Panel (PRP) will rank the proposal for the primary facility and consider it for the secondary facility if it was not competitive for the primary facility. If not competitive at either, an alternative facility may be recommended.

  • Specify safety-related details in the LaserNetUS Initial Safety Screening survey during the proposal submission process. List and describe any safety concerns related to samples, equipment, or techniques and how these issues will be addressed.

  • There is no cost to submit proposals or conduct experiments at participating institutions. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (DOE-FES) provides experiment time at LaserNetUS facilities free of charge, but users are generally responsible for their own travel, target expenses, and hardware required by the experiment. While most of our users fund their experiments through larger research grants, limited funds are available to Principal Investigators (PIs). The LaserNetUS Users Office will contact PIs of shortlisted experiments to apply for travel and Materials and Supplies (M&S) mini-grants.

  • Proposals may address broader problems than a single experiment can cover. All proposals must be resubmitted for peer review each cycle. Without sufficient progress information (e.g., data dissemination, publications), the PRP may postpone consideration until a future cycle.

  • The PRP will consider the applicant’s publication record from prior LaserNetUS facility times. Failure to publish on time could impact the chances of a successful application in a similar area.

  • Proposals can be resubmitted at each call, but this will not happen automatically, and resubmissions will not receive preference during the review process.

  • Multiple submissions from the same team for similar experiments at different LaserNetUS facilities will not be considered. While there is no limit to the number of distinct proposals a team can submit, the PRP may favor the first-best proposal from each team.

  • Proposal teams must acknowledge the host institution and DOE Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences in presentations and publications using the following boilerplate language: “This work was supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences under Contract No. [LaserNetUS contract number from facility]: the LaserNetUS initiative at [Facility],” and any other acknowledgments required by the host institution.

  • The Advanced Beam Laboratory is participating in both the Regular User Proposals and Joint Research Initiatives. Applicants must discuss their needs with the facility point of contact, Jorge Rocca (jorge.rocca@colostate.edu), well in advance of the deadline to confirm the appropriate proposal type.
  • Expanded offerings by Michigan Target Research and Fabrication (MiTRF): Consultation, Component Procurement, Fabrication and/or Assembly, and Characterization. All LaserNetUS laser facility proposals can also request target support from MiTRF by adding a target support request to their Experimental Time Request. Applicants must discuss their target needs with Sallee Klein (salleer@umich.edu) and her team in advance of submission.

Important Dates

Key Events and Deadlines

LaserNetUS has adopted a consistent annual call for proposals to streamline the application process and provide clarity for applicants. Please refer to the following dates below for key events and deadlines. More details can be accessed by clicking the links to the event pages.

 

Announcement Cycle 7 Call for Proposals October 4, 2024
LaserNetUS Open Office Hours, Virtual (Zoom), RSVP Required Wednesdays, Starting October 16, 2024, to November 27, 2024,
from 10-11 AM PT
Proposal Writing Workshop Wednesday, October 23,
2024, from 10-11 AM PST
Town Hall for Cycle 7,
Virtual (Zoom), Join Now
Thursday, November 14,
2024, from 10-11:30 AM PST
Deadline for Proposal Submission December 16, 2024, by 4 PM PT
Proposal Review January 16, 2025, to
February 17, 2025
Technical Feasibility Review February 24, 2025, to
March 11, 2025
Award Letters Sent Late March
Experiment Dates September 2025* to August 2026


*The earliest start date will depend on facility readiness and proposal feasibility.

Please note: The dates provided are approximate and subject to change at any time. Applicants are encouraged to regularly check for updates to ensure they have the most current information.

 

Ready to Submit a Proposal? 

LaserNetUS has transitioned to the Universal Proposal System (UPS), a common platform for managing user scientific proposals across multiple facilities, developed collaboratively by SLAC, Argonne, and Brookhaven National Laboratories. Learn more.

LaserNetUS proposals must be submitted through UPS. To ensure your proposal is complete, all collaborators must have an active UPS account and be listed on the proposal.

Important Note: All members of the research team listed on a proposal must have a UPS account linked to the proposal before submission. Otherwise, the proposal will not be considered.

Proposal Review Process

  1. Proposal Screening and Assignments
    Submitted proposals are first screened for completeness and quality. The Proposal Administrator and the Chair of the PRP (Proposal Review Panel) are responsible for this initial screening. The Chair then assigns three reviewers to each proposal based on subject matter expertise and avoiding known conflicts of interest (COI) from the panel. One of the three reviewers is designated as the primary reviewer.

  2. Initial Review Stage
    All PRP members are required to read at least the abstract of all other proposals to gain a broad understanding of the submissions. During this stage, PRP members review the basic information of each proposal to identify any additional COI. Each proposal is then scored using a rubric that evaluates Intellectual Merit (75%) and Broader Impact (25%). This rubric is developed based on the proposal-type specific template to ensure consistency and fairness in the evaluation process.

  3. Proposal Review Meeting
    Initial rankings are determined based on the quantitative scores from the reviews. The proposal review panel meets in person, and the primary reviewers lead a detailed discussion of each proposal. During this discussion, the panel considers the scores and engages in a thorough conversation. The panel then sorts the proposals by facility and ranks them, taking into account topical balance and a risk/reward assessment to ensure a well-rounded selection. The lead reviewer is responsible for compiling the comments and feedback from the three reviewers and the panel discussion, which is then provided to the applicant.

  4. Facility Feasibility Review
    The short-listed proposals (available slots plus 1-2 alternates) for each facility are forwarded to the Facility POC for an evaluation of technical feasibility. This review ensures that the proposed experiments can be practically and safely conducted with the available resources and infrastructure.

  5. Final Decisions
    The PRP Chair integrates the results of the review and the feasibility assessments to create a final list of recommendations. This list is reviewed by the LaserNetUS Coordinator and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES), who has final approval of awards. Decision letters are emailed to each Principal Investigator (PI), Facility Point of Contact, and the LaserNetUS User Office informing them of the outcome.