- Home
- Apply for an Experiment
Application Process
Select Proposal Type
Getting Started
Select a proposal type from the sidebar to continue.
LaserNetUS invites scientists and engineers from all scientific and technical disciplines to propose experiments that leverage the extensive laser and diagnostic capabilities of LaserNetUS. International Principal Investigators (PIs) and teams are also encouraged to apply. Our user base includes individuals from universities, national laboratories, and private companies.
To apply, you must write a proposal using the official LaserNetUS templates and provide additional details on funding, safety, and export control. Prior to awards, proposals undergo rigorous peer and technical feasibility reviews.
If you have questions about proposal submissions, please refer to our Quick Reference Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, or contact our coordinator at ccurry@slac.stanford.edu.
Regular User Proposals
Participating Facilities
Colorado State University
Advanced Beam Laboratory
Point of contact: Jorge Rocca, jorge.rocca@colostate.edu
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jupiter Laser Facility
Point of contact: Félicie Albert, albert6@llnl.gov
Eligibility
Regular User Proposals are designed for user-led experiments requiring minimal facility support. Users should assemble a multidisciplinary team with the necessary expertise to design and execute the experiment and train and supervise students at all times. Successful applicants will undergo a facility-specific readiness review to ensure preparedness.
If you are new to LaserNetUS or high-power laser experiments, we recommend applying for a Joint Research Initiative for your first experiment. Starting from Cycle 7, we have updated our terminology: roles on an experiment are now defined as Principal Investigator (PI), Co-Principal Investigators (Co-PIs), and Collaborators. Students can serve as PIs but must have an experienced Co-PI and include a detailed training and supervision plan in their proposal.
Proposal Template
All LaserNetUS proposals must be prepared using the proposal-type-specific template. The format and detailed guidelines are intended to help new applicants prepare competitive proposals and standardize the proposal review process.
Steps to Prepare Your Proposal
-
1. Prepare Your Proposal Using the Official Template
Use the proposal-type-specific template to prepare your proposal. The main proposal, excluding references and appendices, must be 6 pages. Additionally, you are strongly encouraged to complete the appendices for the tentative research team, technical parameter table, and target support request.
-
2. Stay Updated on Facility Capabilities and Changes
To learn more about the available facilities and diagnostics, please visit our Facilities page. This page offers detailed information about each facility, including its capabilities, available diagnostics, and facility representatives’ contact information. Additionally, attending the Town Hall hosted by the Facility Points of Contact (POCs) each cycle is the best way to get this information quickly. Below, you will find specific changes from the previous cycle.
-
3. Write a Summary of Changes or Updates for Similar Proposals
If your proposal is similar to a previous one (whether declined or awarded), you will be asked for a brief summary of changes or progress update in the LaserNetUS Proposal Details survey.
-
4. Designate Primary and Secondary Facility Choices
Each proposal is for one specific experiment, with the option to designate a first and second choice for a facility. The Proposal Review Panel (PRP) will rank the proposal for the primary facility and consider it for the secondary facility if it was not competitive for the primary facility. If not competitive at either, an alternative facility may be recommended.
-
5. Submit Safety Information During Proposal Submission
Specify safety-related details in the LaserNetUS Initial Safety Screening survey during the proposal submission process. List and describe any safety concerns related to samples, equipment, or techniques and how these issues will be addressed.
-
6. Understand the Cost and Funding Structure
There is no cost to submit proposals or to receive experimental beam time at participating LaserNetUS facilities. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (DOE-FES) provides beam time free of charge. At this time, LaserNetUS cannot provide additional funding for user travel, target fabrication, materials and supplies (M&S), or experiment-specific hardware. All other associated costs—including salaries, equipment, consumables/targets, shipping, and travel—are the responsibility of the proposing team.
-
7. Resubmit Proposals for Scientific Campaigns Each Cycle
Proposals may address broader problems than a single experiment can cover. All proposals must be resubmitted for peer review each cycle. Without sufficient progress information (e.g., data dissemination, publications), the PRP may postpone consideration until a future cycle.
-
8. Maintain a Strong Publication Record from Previous Experiments
We will consider the applicant’s publication record from prior LaserNetUS facility times. Failure to publish on time could impact the chances of a successful application in a similar area.
-
9. Resubmit Proposals Manually for Each Call
Proposals can be resubmitted at each call, but this will not happen automatically, and resubmissions will not receive preference during the review process.
-
10. Avoid Multiple Submissions for Similar Experiments
Multiple submissions from the same team for similar experiments at different LaserNetUS facilities will not be considered. While there is no limit to the number of distinct proposals a team can submit, the PRP may favor the first-best proposal from each team.
-
11. Acknowledge LaserNetUS Funding in Research Outputs
All proposal teams are required to acknowledge LaserNetUS, the host institution, the DOE Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, and any additional funding sources as required by the host institution in all presentations and publications stemming from the funded experiment.
For specific wording and guidelines on how to appropriately acknowledge these contributions, please consult our Procedure to Acknowledge LaserNetUS Funding. This ensures proper recognition and compliance with funding requirements.
- The Advanced Beam Laboratory is participating in both the Regular User Proposals and Joint Research Initiatives. Applicants must discuss their needs with the facility point of contact, Jorge Rocca (jorge.rocca@colostate.edu), well in advance of the deadline to confirm the appropriate proposal type.
- The Jupiter Laser Facility has commissioned STILETTO during Cycle 7. Users planning on proposing an experiment that utilizes STILETTO should contact Félicie Albert (albert6@llnl.gov) prior to submission to discuss their specific parameter requirements.
- For more information about STILETTO, see the Science & Technology Review article titled "Stepping Up Laser Pulse Capabilities" covering recent advances at NIF, or the recent paper in Physical Review Letters by A. Longman et al., "Pump with Broadband Probe Experiments for Single-Shot Measurements of Plasma Conditions and Crossed-Beam Energy Transfer"
Important Dates
Key Events and Deadlines
LaserNetUS has adopted a consistent annual call for proposals to streamline the application process and provide clarity for applicants. Please refer to the following dates below for key events and deadlines. More details can be accessed by clicking the links to the event pages.
| Announcement Cycle 8A Call for Proposals | November 14, 2025 |
| Proposal Writing Workshop | Check back soon. |
| Town Hall for Cycle 8A, Virtual (Zoom) |
Check back soon. |
| Deadline for Proposal Submission | January 20, 2026, by 4 PM PT |
| Proposal Review | February 6, 2026, to March 13, 2026 |
| Technical Feasibility Review | March 13, 2026, to March 27, 2026 |
| Award Letters Sent | Early April 2026 |
| Experiment Dates | August 2026* to September 2027 |
*The earliest start date will depend on facility readiness and proposal feasibility.
Please note: The dates provided are approximate and subject to change at any time. Applicants are encouraged to regularly check for updates to ensure they have the most current information.
Ready to Submit a Proposal?
LaserNetUS proposals must be submitted through UPS. To ensure your proposal is complete, all collaborators must have an active UPS account and be listed on the proposal.
Important Note: All members of the research team listed on a proposal must have a UPS account linked to the proposal before submission. Otherwise, the proposal will not be considered.
Proposal Review Process
- Proposal Screening and Assignments
Submitted proposals are first screened for completeness and quality. The Proposal Administrator and the Chair of the Proposal Review Panel (PRP) are responsible for this initial screening. The Chair then assigns three reviewers to each proposal based on subject matter expertise and avoiding known conflicts of interest (COI) from the panel. One of the three reviewers is designated as the primary reviewer. - Initial Review Stage
All PRP members are required to read at minimum the abstract of all other proposals to gain a broad understanding of the submissions. During this stage, PRP members review the basic information of each proposal to identify any additional COI. Each proposal is then scored using a rubric that evaluates Intellectual Merit (75%) and Broader Impact (25%). This rubric was developed based on the proposal-type-specific template to ensure consistency and fairness in the evaluation process. - Proposal Review Panel Meeting
Initial rankings are determined based on the quantitative scores from the reviews. The PRP meets in person, and the primary reviewers lead a detailed discussion of each proposal. During this discussion, the panel considers the scores and engages in a thorough conversation. The panel then sorts the proposals by facility and ranks them, taking into account topical balance and a risk/reward assessment to ensure a well-rounded selection. The lead reviewer is responsible for compiling the comments and feedback from the three reviewers and the panel discussion, which is then provided to the applicant. - Facility Feasibility Review
The short-listed proposals (available slots plus 1-2 alternates) for each facility are forwarded to the Facility POC to evaluate technical feasibility. This review ensures that the proposed experiments can be practically and safely conducted with the available resources and infrastructure. - Final Decisions
The PRP Chair integrates the results of the review and the feasibility assessments to create a final list of recommendations. This list is reviewed by the LaserNetUS Coordinator and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES), who has final approval of awards. Decision letters are emailed to each Principal Investigator (PI), Facility POC, and the LaserNetUS User Office informing them of the outcome.
Getting Started
Select a proposal type from the sidebar to continue.
LaserNetUS invites scientists and engineers from all scientific and technical disciplines to propose experiments that leverage the extensive laser and diagnostic capabilities of LaserNetUS. International Principal Investigators (PIs) and teams are also encouraged to apply. Our user base includes individuals from universities, national laboratories, and private companies.
To apply, you must write a proposal using the official LaserNetUS templates and provide additional details on funding, safety, and export control. Prior to awards, proposals undergo rigorous peer and technical feasibility reviews.
If you have questions about proposal submissions, please refer to our Quick Reference Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, or contact our coordinator at ccurry@slac.stanford.edu.
Joint Research Initiative Proposals
Participating Facilities
Colorado State University
Advanced Beam Laboratory
Point of contact: Jorge Rocca, jorge.rocca@colostate.edu
Eligibility
Regular User Proposals are designed for user-led experiments requiring minimal facility support. Users should assemble a multidisciplinary team with the necessary expertise to design and execute the experiment and train and supervise students at all times. Successful applicants will undergo a facility-specific readiness review to ensure preparedness.
If you are new to LaserNetUS or high-power laser experiments, we recommend applying for a Joint Research Initiative for your first experiment. Starting from Cycle 7, we have updated our terminology: roles on an experiment are now defined as Principal Investigator (PI), Co-Principal Investigators (Co-PIs), and Collaborators. Students can serve as PIs but must have an experienced Co-PI and include a detailed training and supervision plan in their proposal.
Proposal Template
All LaserNetUS proposals must be prepared using the proposal-type-specific template. The format and detailed guidelines are intended to help new applicants prepare competitive proposals and standardize the proposal review process.
Steps to Prepare Your Proposal
-
1. Prepare Your Proposal Using the Official Template
Use the proposal-type-specific template to prepare your proposal. The main proposal, excluding references and appendices, must be 6 pages. Additionally, you are strongly encouraged to complete the appendices for the tentative research team, technical parameter table, and target support request.
-
2. Stay Updated on Facility Capabilities and Changes
To learn more about the available facilities and diagnostics, please visit our Facilities page. This page offers detailed information about each facility, including its capabilities, available diagnostics, and facility representatives’ contact information. Additionally, attending the Town Hall hosted by the Facility Points of Contact (POCs) each cycle is the best way to get this information quickly. Below, you will find specific changes from the previous cycle.
-
3. Write a Summary of Changes or Updates for Similar Proposals
If your proposal is similar to a previous one (whether declined or awarded), you will be asked for a brief summary of changes or progress update in the LaserNetUS Proposal Details survey.
-
4. Designate Primary and Secondary Facility Choices
Each proposal is for one specific experiment, with the option to designate a first and second choice for a facility. The Proposal Review Panel (PRP) will rank the proposal for the primary facility and consider it for the secondary facility if it was not competitive for the primary facility. If not competitive at either, an alternative facility may be recommended.
-
5. Submit Safety Information During Proposal Submission
Specify safety-related details in the LaserNetUS Initial Safety Screening survey during the proposal submission process. List and describe any safety concerns related to samples, equipment, or techniques and how these issues will be addressed.
-
6. Understand the Cost and Funding Structure
There is no cost to submit proposals or to receive experimental beam time at participating LaserNetUS facilities. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (DOE-FES) provides beam time free of charge. At this time, LaserNetUS cannot provide additional funding for user travel, target fabrication, materials and supplies (M&S), or experiment-specific hardware. All other associated costs—including salaries, equipment, consumables/targets, shipping, and travel—are the responsibility of the proposing team.
-
7. Resubmit Proposals for Scientific Campaigns Each Cycle
Proposals may address broader problems than a single experiment can cover. All proposals must be resubmitted for peer review each cycle. Without sufficient progress information (e.g., data dissemination, publications), the PRP may postpone consideration until a future cycle.
-
8. Maintain a Strong Publication Record from Previous Experiments
We will consider the applicant’s publication record from prior LaserNetUS facility times. Failure to publish on time could impact the chances of a successful application in a similar area.
-
9. Resubmit Proposals Manually for Each Call
Proposals can be resubmitted at each call, but this will not happen automatically, and resubmissions will not receive preference during the review process.
-
10. Avoid Multiple Submissions for Similar Experiments
Multiple submissions from the same team for similar experiments at different LaserNetUS facilities will not be considered. While there is no limit to the number of distinct proposals a team can submit, the PRP may favor the first-best proposal from each team.
-
11. Acknowledge LaserNetUS Funding in Research Products
All proposal teams are required to acknowledge LaserNetUS, the host institution, the DOE Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, and any additional funding sources as required by the host institution in all presentations and publications stemming from the funded experiment.
For specific wording and guidelines on how to appropriately acknowledge these contributions, please consult our Procedure to Acknowledge LaserNetUS Funding. This ensures proper recognition and compliance with funding requirements.
Important Dates
Key Events and Deadlines
LaserNetUS has adopted a consistent annual call for proposals to streamline the application process and provide clarity for applicants. Please refer to the following dates below for key events and deadlines. More details can be accessed by clicking the links to the event pages.
| Announcement Cycle 8A Call for Proposals | November 14, 2025 |
| Proposal Writing Workshop | Check back soon. |
| Town Hall for Cycle 8A, Virtual (Zoom) |
Check back soon. |
| Deadline for Proposal Submission | January 20, 2026, by 4 PM PT |
| Proposal Review | February 6, 2026, to March 13, 2026 |
| Technical Feasibility Review | March 13, 2026, to March 27, 2026 |
| Award Letters Sent | Early April 2026 |
| Experiment Dates | August 2026* to September 2027 |
*The earliest start date will depend on facility readiness and proposal feasibility.
Please note: The dates provided are approximate and subject to change at any time. Applicants are encouraged to regularly check for updates to ensure they have the most current information.
Ready to Submit a Proposal?
LaserNetUS proposals must be submitted through UPS. To ensure your proposal is complete, all collaborators must have an active UPS account and be listed on the proposal.
Important Note: All members of the research team listed on a proposal must have a UPS account linked to the proposal before submission. Otherwise, the proposal will not be considered.
Proposal Review Process
- Proposal Screening and Assignments
Submitted proposals are first screened for completeness and quality. The Proposal Administrator and the Chair of the PRP (Proposal Review Panel) are responsible for this initial screening. The Chair then assigns three reviewers to each proposal based on subject matter expertise and avoiding known conflicts of interest (COI) from the panel. One of the three reviewers is designated as the primary reviewer. - Initial Review Stage
All PRP members are required to read at least the abstract of all other proposals to gain a broad understanding of the submissions. During this stage, PRP members review the basic information of each proposal to identify any additional COI. Each proposal is then scored using a rubric that evaluates Intellectual Merit (75%) and Broader Impact (25%). This rubric is developed based on the proposal-type specific template to ensure consistency and fairness in the evaluation process. - Proposal Review Meeting
Initial rankings are determined based on the quantitative scores from the reviews. The proposal review panel meets in person, and the primary reviewers lead a detailed discussion of each proposal. During this discussion, the panel considers the scores and engages in a thorough conversation. The panel then sorts the proposals by facility and ranks them, taking into account topical balance and a risk/reward assessment to ensure a well-rounded selection. The lead reviewer is responsible for compiling the comments and feedback from the three reviewers and the panel discussion, which is then provided to the applicant. - Facility Feasibility Review
The short-listed proposals (available slots plus 1-2 alternates) for each facility are forwarded to the Facility POC for an evaluation of technical feasibility. This review ensures that the proposed experiments can be practically and safely conducted with the available resources and infrastructure. - Final Decisions
The PRP Chair integrates the results of the review and the feasibility assessments to create a final list of recommendations. This list is reviewed by the LaserNetUS Coordinator and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES), who has final approval of awards. Decision letters are emailed to each Principal Investigator (PI), Facility Point of Contact, and the LaserNetUS User Office informing them of the outcome.